一个名叫"失熵小孩哥"的未成年网暴惯犯，又一次在NGA社区掀起腥风血血雨。这次的受害者是论坛用户本人，被直接开盒——真实姓名、个人信息等隐私数据惨遭泄露。主楼附上了4张聊天截图作为铁证。
帖子一出，评论区立刻炸了锅，但让人意外的是——争议焦点竟然不是开盒者，而是受害者本人。
高赞评论（5楼）率先开炮："你非得跟他较什么劲？替腾讯来伸张正义了？"该网友洋洋洒洒写了一大段，把受害者与"拿手猛捅电门"
水季在河道露营"相提并论，虽然也声明"作为受害者我当然同情lz被开盒"，但核心论点显然是——你招惹了精神病，被咬也是活该。", "这种论调立刻引来大量反驳。7楼网友直接回怼："这话说的，被开盒还成楼主的错了"；8楼更是一针见血地指出这是"经典怪受害者不够完美"。18楼也跟进质疑："错还成被开盒的了？"而11楼则嘲讽地回复那位受害者有罪论者："点开，满意离开"——言下之意是看你的成分就知道你什么立场了。", "更多网友则将矛头对准了"失熵小孩哥"本身的棘手程度。10楼一针见血地指出："如果腾讯都拿他没什么办法的话，开个盒报警能有什么办法呢？"13楼则感叹未成年身份简直是护身符："未成年确实好，那几个故意杀人的畜生都能活，这种虎b哨子就更没办法了。
, "不过大多数网友的态度还是一致的：赶紧报警。6楼、12楼、15楼、16楼纷纷建议楼主保存证据并报警处理。15楼甚至乐观地表示"说不定能再送几个人进去陪主机踩缝纫机"。12楼则在同情之余也忍不住吐槽："你和这种风暴中心人物私聊，都是在聊什么呢？tx都拿他没办法。吃瓜还把自己变成瓜了。
, "14楼的提问颇具深意，既肯定了"开盒肯定不对、非常不对"，也好奇地追问："为什么你会提到'我可以放过你'？你又做了什么'不放过他的事'？"——暗示这场开盒事件可能并非单方面施暴，双方之间或许存在更复杂的恩怨纠葛。", "目前楼主并未公开后续进展。整个事件折射出的，是社区面对未成年网暴者时的集体无力感——法律追责困难重重，平台治理形同虚设，受害者想维权却发现连对手都"打不着"。而评论区那句"玩舟玩的"虽然是社区梗的无差别攻击，却也隐约指向了这类网络暴力往往发源于游戏圈的现实。" ], "en": [
A minor internet troll known as 'Shishang Xiaohaige' (失熵小孩哥 — roughly 'The Fading Entropy Kid') has struck again on NGA, this time doxxing a forum user by leaking their real name and personal information. The OP attached four chat screenshots as evidence.
But here's where it gets spicy: the comment section's hottest debate wasn't about the doxxer — it was about whether the victim had it coming.
The most upvoted comment (Floor 5) went full armchair philosopher: 'Why did you even pick a fight with this guy? Standing up for Tencent's honor?' The user wrote an essay comparing the OP's actions to 'sticking your hand in an electric socket' or 'camping in a riverbed during flood season.' While paying lip service to 'of course I sympathize with the doxxing victim,' the message was clear: you poked a rabid dog, and this is what happens.
This take got roasted immediately. Floor 7 shot back: 'So getting doxxed is somehow the victim's fault now?' Floor 8 called it out for what it was — 'the classic blame-the-imperfect-victim playbook.' Floor 18 piled on: 'So being in the wrong means you deserve to get doxxed?' Meanwhile, Floor 11 slyly responded with a dismissive 'clicked on their profile, left satisfied' — implying the original commenter's track record spoke for itself.
Other commenters zeroed in on just how untouchable the doxxer is. Floor 10 dropped a devastating observation: 'If even Tencent can't do anything about him, what's a police report going to accomplish?' Floor 13 lamented that being a minor in China is essentially a get-out-of-jail-free card: 'Minors really do have it easy — those kids who literally committed murder walked free, so this kind of unhinged troll is basically untouchable.'
Still, the majority consensus was clear: report to the police. Floors 6, 12, 15, and 16 all urged the OP to preserve evidence and file a report. Floor 15 even optimistically suggested it 'might send a few more people to join the gang in prison.' Floor 12, while sympathetic, couldn't resist asking: 'Why were you even DMing someone in the eye of the storm? Even Tencent couldn't handle him — you were spectating the drama and became part of it.'
Floor 14 raised a pointed question that hinted at deeper complexity: while firmly condemning the doxxing, they asked the OP why they had mentioned 'I could let you off the hook' — suggesting this might not be a simple case of one-sided harassment, and that there may be a more tangled grudge between the two parties.
As of now, the OP hasn't shared any updates on the outcome. The whole incident paints a grim picture of how communities deal with juvenile cyberbullies in China: legal accountability is nearly impossible when the perpetrator is underage, platform moderation is toothless, and victims find themselves fighting an opponent who's essentially untouchable. The throwaway comment 'typical Arknights player' at the end was a generic game-community diss, but it also hints at how these online harassment sagas often originate in gacha gaming circles.
评论 (0)
暂无评论，来说两句吧！ 🍉