Imagine stabbing someone, then publicly declaring 'I forgive you for letting me stab you.' That's essentially what just happened in the Reverse: 1999 fan art community. A Weibo artist baselessly accused developer Deep Blue Interactive of plagiarizing their art style and using AI-generated content, inciting their followers to attack the company en masse. Deep Blue responded with a formal cease-and-desist letter. Instead of backing down, the artist posted a lengthy statement declaring they would 'no longer pursue Deep Blue's illegal act of sending a lawyer's letter' — framing themselves as the magnanimous victim.
The story is actually pretty straightforward. The artist publicly accused Deep Blue of copying their art style and hinted the company used AI generation tools — all without any professional appraisal or concrete evidence. Their Weibo comment section was strategically curated to keep the 'AI art detection' accusations alive, effectively weaponizing their audience against the studio. The retweet section became an echo chamber of diehard fans, with one particularly memorable take captured by NGA users: 'Sure, I made a baseless plagiarism accusation — that's 1% my fault. But sending a legal warning? That's 99% YOUR fault.'
When Deep Blue's legal team sent a formal cease-and-desist — essentially 'apologize or see you in court' — the artist's response left NGA users absolutely floored. Rather than apologizing, they fired back with a public statement claiming Deep Blue's lawyer letter was 'illegal' and that they would 'no longer pursue the matter.' The artist even claimed they had been 'helping Deep Blue manage their PR' and that it was Deep Blue who was 'playing dead' by not responding, while 'allowing players to attack me.' In the artist's version of events, they were the victim, and Deep Blue was the wrongdoer.
NGA commenters were unanimously unimpressed. One top reply cut straight to the point: 'Deep Blue literally said either apologize or we'll sue. What is this, a Weibo court? Just file the lawsuit and be done with it.' They also pointed out the artist's hilariously wrong use of legal terminology like 'subjective fault' (主观过失). Another commenter nailed the classic internet artist playbook: 'This is standard Weibo artist behavior — I was wrong ≠ I admit I was wrong.' A particularly spicy reply asked: 'Wait, who's forgiving whom here? You're the one who made a baseless accusation, got called out, and now you're acting like YOU'RE doing Deep Blue a favor by letting them off the hook? The audacity.'
One commenter zeroed in on the artist's calculated strategy: 'Most unhinged episode yet. The original post implies their work was copied, while the comment section is deliberately left full of AI-accusation discussion to farm engagement. Did they really think nobody would see through this?' Another offered a razor-sharp analysis of the artist's 'barnacle' approach to controversy — no matter whether Deep Blue sues or stays silent, it can be spun: 'Sue and it's a corporation bullying an individual. Don't sue and it's because they're scared.'
User replies dug up even wilder quotes from the artist — 'The one playing dead isn't me, it's Deep Blue,' 'I've been helping Deep Blue manage their comment section but they're letting players attack me,' and 'I won't delete my posts until Deep Blue apologizes to me.' One furious commenter responded: 'A company with hundreds of employees is supposed to play your little game of house?' Others declared the artist's legal knowledge 'the kind of terrifying legal illiteracy where someone Googles a few terms and tries to use them as threats,' predicting 'fast forward to them crowdfunding their lawsuit settlement from their fan followers.'
As the drama escalated, eagle-eyed observers noticed the artist's block list was growing at an alarming rate — from 7 people in the morning to 15 by noon to 26 by the time the screenshots were taken, with numbers still climbing. The artist's response to criticism? Not addressing the accusations, but hitting the block button en masse. One NGA user delivered what might be the most fitting epitaph for this entire saga: 'If I were Deep Blue's legal team, the first thing I'd do after reading that Weibo post is start drafting the lawsuit.'
The situation is still unfolding. The artist claims they 'won't pursue Deep Blue,' while NGA users are sitting back with popcorn, waiting for Deep Blue's lawyers to do the pursuing instead. Between someone who made baseless public accusations that damaged a company's reputation, and a company that responded with proper legal channels, the question of who has the legal high ground isn't exactly a cliffhanger. This victim-perpetrator reversal drama is far from over.
评论 (0)
暂无评论，来说两句吧！ 🍉