When a gacha game copies a rival's homework, that's Tuesday on the CN internet. But when the two games turn out to be financially intertwined? Now THAT's a plot twist worthy of primetime drama.
An NGA user recently dropped a post with a spicy title: Does Zhou Jian (Reverse: 1999's producer) have a crush on Hai Mao (Arknights' producer)? The trigger? Version 1.6 of Reverse: 1999 shipped with a laundry list of features that look suspiciously lifted straight from Arknights.
The post laid out the receipts: the v1.6 limited banner characters now feature dynamic Live2D illustrations — identical to how Arknights handles its limited operators. The new roguelike mode was instantly dubbed 'Arknights Plus' by the community. The hard-mode content 'Mane Bulletin' (鬃毛邮报) copied the shop exchange system from Arknights' Contingency Contract event. Even the lightweight event rerun mechanics were borrowed wholesale.
The poster even invoked an old NGA meme, comparing the situation to when Yu Zhong (Girls' Frontline's producer) was accused of making Hai Mao's designs in another project — essentially calling Zhou Jian the 'Yuan Hong of mobile games' (a reference to the infamous gacha industry drama circle). The shade was absolutely nuclear.
But the comments section didn't go full pitchfork mode. Veteran Arknights players pushed back: 'Arknights arguably has the best roguelike implementation in the gacha space — referencing it isn't a sin. What matters is whether 1999 has its own identity.' The core gameplay is fundamentally different too — Arknights is a 12-unit tower defense while 1999 is turn-based RPG. Others dismissed the drama entirely: 'This ain't even gossip. Come back when you've got news about actual limited banner controversies.'
The comments also provided key gacha intel: 1999's limited banner is single-rate-up with a 70% featured character chance, 140-pull hard pity, and a 200-pull spark system (pity exchange), with the banner running for 42 days. Compared to Arknights' infamous double-rate-up 300-pull spark, 1999's system is actually more generous. Some players openly said they preferred it.
The real plot twist dropped in comments #14–18. Someone casually mentioned 'When you whale in 1999, Hypergryph gets a cut too,' and the rabbit hole opened: it turns out that Hypergryph (Arknights' developer) has indirect equity in Deep Blue Interactive (1999's developer) through a company called 游扳 (You Ban). So technically, money spent on 1999 partially flows back to the Arknights side of the business. Players lost it: 'They're sharing a ventilator!' — the ultimate 'copying yourself' meme.
One dual-game player summed up the situation perfectly: 'Right now it's Schrödinger's homage — if 1999 players are happy, it's called "learning from a successful model." If they're mad, it's called "Arknights didn't invent these anyway."' The cope is real, and the corporate incest makes it even funnier.
评论 (0)
暂无评论，来说两句吧！ 🍉