[Reverse: 1999] Official "Sophisticated" Response: When Art Meets "Throwing Stones at Dogs"

Recently, the official team of 'Reverse: 1999' released a highly 'artistic' explanation regarding the plot incident where a dog is struck in-game. Instead of resolving the controversy, this response only served to confuse players further, leading many to mock the studio for acting like pretentious 'riddlers'.

In the face of this cryptic interpretation, players flocked to the comments to vent: 'I can't comprehend this game anymore' and labeled it a literal case of 'throwing stones at dogs'—a Chinese idiom used here to describe the official's dismissive, defensive attitude toward critics. Many players pointed out the irony: the devs have time to explain abstract lore, but refuse to address major concerns like skin pricing. Sarcastic comments abounded, with one player quipping, 'It’s just too sophisticated; I hate that I’m not a 'Mystery Expert' [the game's term for characters] myself.'