Recently, Article 10 of the 'Draft for Comments on Generative Artificial Intelligence Service Management' has sparked heated discussions within the gaming community. The regulation states that AI service providers must implement measures to prevent users from becoming overly dependent on or addicted to AI-generated content. This clause immediately triggered a wave of mockery and skepticism among forum users.
The community debate quickly split. Some netizens joked that if AIs could speak for themselves, they would likely demand anti-addiction protocols to protect their 'AI human rights' after being forced to answer endless questions 24/7 without rest.
Regarding the policy itself, some argue that introducing such oversight at such an early stage of AI development is 'far-fetched and confusing.' One user offered a sharp analogy: it's like a guest attending a baby's 100-day celebration and telling the parents not to let the child bully classmates in the future. While the advice is technically correct, it feels premature and bizarre. Additionally, many users expressed cynical views regarding the 'request for comments' process, questioning whether public feedback actually influences final policy decisions.
评论 (0)
暂无评论，来说两句吧！ 🍉