Recently, the long-standing copyright lawsuit between Netease and 'Mini World' has reached a verdict, sparking a heated discussion in the NGA community.
According to the detailed ruling, the court found the defendant guilty of partial infringement and ordered Mini Wan to pay 50 million RMB to Netease. However, Netease's core demand to cease the operation of 'Mini World' was denied. The court ordered the removal of 230 specific infringing game elements.
The community reacted with mixed emotions. One user joked, 'Wait, they were fined 50 million? That's not too bad.'
Regarding the industry-wide headache of 'whether game mechanics are copyrightable,' veteran users pointed out that it's nearly impossible to win such a case based on mechanics alone unless the source code was directly stolen. Some were confused: 'I remember they allegedly scraped the code, how did they lose?'
The comment section also drew comparisons to other cases, noting that without a clear verdict on the exact copying of source code, it's legally difficult to force a competitor off the market.
评论 (0)
暂无评论，来说两句吧！ 🍉